Posters That Relate to the Hand-made Type I made

Designer's Code of Ethics poster by Meg Lewis (@darngooood) for Mule Design - Purchase poster at link!
Meg Lewis Designers Code of Ethics poster
Paul Rand
Jen Mussari, Paul Rand
Courage the Cowardly Dog (1999)
Courage the Cowardly Dog,

The first poster is the kind of type I wanted to make. The second is the same cut-out feel mine has. The third has the text freely overlapping each other and the rounded letterforms are angled similarly to mine.

Lettering Project

I started with the idea of using the idiom in the loop to question if people have actually looked up what they know about the pandemic and the protective measures they use. Then realized it felt too gentle for such a serious issue and the question would be answered yes even if they didn’t go to the right kind of sites(right = trustworthy). I decided to have a demanding phrase to tell people to research their ideas around the pandemic. I used tracing paper over my original sketch to get a couple versions of the lettering; however, my glass pen I was trying to use to keep my lettering steady broke on me twice. After it broke I used a brush pen but didn’t like the way the lines worked so I used a fine liner and a sharpie to get the final version. I was using tracing paper from the first lettering set on so I edited the photo to be easier for me to import it into illustrator and edit to my liking. I changed a good chunk of the lettering inside of illustrator as the variance in weight didn’t function the way I originally intended. Above is the final and below is the process.

George Nelson’s “Good Design: What is it for?”

This has made me realize that my ranting about the philosophical idea of the human soul isn’t uncommon for designers discussing their work and how it relates to others’ views and ideas. When starting to discuss what good design isn’t George Nelson describes what good design is: “…a manifestation of the capacity of the human spirit to transcend its limitations.” This idea of design being a representation to the extent of a human spirit’s ability to go beyond their restrictions intrigues me as it makes me think about who wants these representations of the ascent beyond the limits set for the designer. Generally, designers don’t need these embodiments of the other designer’s ascent. Is it those who tried to break limits of their spirit and failed or is it those who don’t feel they need to break their own and can get the same effects from another’s efforts? Is it simply those who need the design who get them or do they end up among those who do not know who created it and why?
Designers explain away aesthetics because laymen don’t understand it. Nelson talks about stating something is functional or more functional a certain way was easier than describing something as an aesthetic choice. Today most people have heard the term aesthetics and talk about it like it’s a common word, at least in my experience. Given the amount of knowledge we have at our fingertips today, it’d be kind of hard to explain away aesthetic choices as functional ones. The client or whoever is being described a partial lie about the reason for doing said thing can simply look up what terms you used and find the errors to the logic rather quickly if they understand how to look stuff up.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started